If state lawmakers agree to let casinos end live dog racing in Iowa, greyhound owners and kennels would be paid a “soft landing” fee and the state treasury would get an extra $10 million a year, according to a proposed bill.
Legislators now face a decision: Should they accept cash to let casinos off the hook for their obligation to subsidize dog racing? Or keep dog racing going for the sake of the economic boost from the dog-breeding industry?
This is the second straight year that Harrah’s Entertainment Inc. has lobbied to get out of a state law that’s become increasingly expensive for the casino company as consumer interest in dog racing dwindles.
The bill would affect Harrah’s track in Council Bluffs and the city-owned dog track in Dubuque.
Three senators assigned to study the bill agreed Thursday to advance it.
But one, Sen. Jack Hatch, D-Des Moines, said he won’t support the bill unless it requires Iowa’s two racetrack-casinos to make a combined yearly $10 million payment in license fees indefinitely.As written, the bill calls for the payments to the state’s general fund to end after seven years.
Hatch said he also would like answers on how this would affect the Dubuque casino and the greyhound industry in general.
Senate Study Bill 1064 would let the two racetrack-casinos discontinue live dog races but continue wagering on simulcast dog races. It would boost the license fee for the Dubuque dog track to $3 million a year for the next seven years, and the license fee for the Council Bluffs track would be $7 million.The bill also would create a “greyhound owners and kennels retirement fund” under the control of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. Money would come from a state fund that by law promotes dog racing and from purse money the casinos would have paid out.
Asked his thoughts, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said Thursday: “I haven’t even looked at that piece of legislation yet.”
A lobbyist for Harrah’s, Jim Carney, told the subcommittee members that only seven states continue to race dogs. “Dog racing is simply dead,” he said. “I mean, that’s a fact.”The live handle, the amount of money consumers wagered at both tracks, has dropped from $7.3 million in 2008 to $6.2 million last year, according to racing and gaming commission records. That’s a 15 percent drop, he pointed out.
A lobbyist for the greyhound industry, Don Avenson, countered: “It’s a growing industry.”
Avenson said Iowa’s racing and breeding industry employed about 800 people in 2003, and now employs 1,237, according to a study by Iowa State University professor Dan Otto.David Robinette, who owns Plum Creek Kennel in Elliott, said he has raced dogs for 30 years. He said he and his wife and five children moved to Iowa in 1998 because of the state’s racing program.
Bill would end Greyhound dog racing but assist owners, kennels
If state lawmakers agree to let casinos end live dog racing in Iowa, greyhound owners and kennels would be paid a “soft landing” fee and the state treasury would get an extra $10 million a year, according to a proposed bill.
Legislators now face a decision: Should they accept cash to let casinos off the hook for their obligation to subsidize dog racing? Or keep dog racing going for the sake of the economic boost from the dog-breeding industry?
This is the second straight year that Harrah’s Entertainment Inc. has lobbied to get out of a state law that’s become increasingly expensive for the casino company as consumer interest in dog racing dwindles.
The bill would affect Harrah’s track in Council Bluffs and the city-owned dog track in Dubuque.
Three senators assigned to study the bill agreed Thursday to advance it.
But one, Sen. Jack Hatch, D-Des Moines, said he won’t support the bill unless it requires Iowa’s two racetrack-casinos to make a combined yearly $10 million payment in license fees indefinitely.As written, the bill calls for the payments to the state’s general fund to end after seven years.
Hatch said he also would like answers on how this would affect the Dubuque casino and the greyhound industry in general.
Senate Study Bill 1064 would let the two racetrack-casinos discontinue live dog races but continue wagering on simulcast dog races. It would boost the license fee for the Dubuque dog track to $3 million a year for the next seven years, and the license fee for the Council Bluffs track would be $7 million.The bill also would create a “greyhound owners and kennels retirement fund” under the control of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission. Money would come from a state fund that by law promotes dog racing and from purse money the casinos would have paid out.
Asked his thoughts, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal, D-Council Bluffs, said Thursday: “I haven’t even looked at that piece of legislation yet.”
A lobbyist for Harrah’s, Jim Carney, told the subcommittee members that only seven states continue to race dogs. “Dog racing is simply dead,” he said. “I mean, that’s a fact.”The live handle, the amount of money consumers wagered at both tracks, has dropped from $7.3 million in 2008 to $6.2 million last year, according to racing and gaming commission records. That’s a 15 percent drop, he pointed out.
A lobbyist for the greyhound industry, Don Avenson, countered: “It’s a growing industry.”
Avenson said Iowa’s racing and breeding industry employed about 800 people in 2003, and now employs 1,237, according to a study by Iowa State University professor Dan Otto.David Robinette, who owns Plum Creek Kennel in Elliott, said he has raced dogs for 30 years. He said he and his wife and five children moved to Iowa in 1998 because of the state’s racing program.